DAVE
Dhokal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ridhmal – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to it are that the plaintiff-respondents brought a monetary suit against the appellants for Rs. 15,000/-. The suit was filed on 30.10.52. On the same day the plaintiffs presented an application in the trial court saying that their claim involved a large sum, that the defendants jagir was likely to be resumed very soon because of the enactment of the Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act. that if the jagir would be so resumed the realisation of the decree would not only be difficult but impossible, that the very purpose of bringing the suit would be defeated and therefore it was prayed that a receiver should be appointed for realising the income of the jagir and keep it in the custody of the court till the decision of the suit. One of the plaintiffs viz. Ridmal filed an affidavit in support of the application. Therein it was further mentioned that the defendants had transferred their jeep to their relative. Notice of this application was given to the defendant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.