SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 240

DAVE
Dhokal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ridhmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal, for Appellant; Hastimal, for Respondents

Dave, J.—This is an appeal by the defendants under Order XLIII Rule 1 Clause (c) C. P. C. from the order of the Civil Judge, Balotra, dated 10th November, 1952, appointing a receiver of their jagir.

2. The facts giving rise to it are that the plaintiff-respondents brought a monetary suit against the appellants for Rs. 15,000/-. The suit was filed on 30.10.52. On the same day the plaintiffs presented an application in the trial court saying that their claim involved a large sum, that the defendants jagir was likely to be resumed very soon because of the enactment of the Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act. that if the jagir would be so resumed the realisation of the decree would not only be difficult but impossible, that the very purpose of bringing the suit would be defeated and therefore it was prayed that a receiver should be appointed for realising the income of the jagir and keep it in the custody of the court till the decision of the suit. One of the plaintiffs viz. Ridmal filed an affidavit in support of the application. Therein it was further mentioned that the defendants had transferred their jeep to their relative. Notice of this application was given to the defendant
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top