SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 282

MODI
Ramjilal – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Board, Bhadra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chaitandas, for Appellant; Ganpatsingh, for Respondent

Modi, J.—This is a second appeal by the plaintiff Ramjilal in a suit for injunction.

2. The plaintiff-appellant obtained a piece of open land 16 sq. gaj in area from the defendant Municipal Committee of Bhadra for purposes of carrying on his trade and was paying a certain amount of rent per month, which is called Tah-bazari. The plaintiffs case was that lately, the defendant had issued a notice to auction the aforesaid land and in pursuance thereof had held the auction on the 31st of August, 1947 and that the course of action adopted by the defendant in auctioning the land was illegal. The plaintiff alleged that all that the defendant was entitled to do was to recover the Tah-bazari and that it had no power to auction the land so long as the plaintiff was prepared to pay the agreed amount. The plaintiff therefore filed the suit, out of which the present appeal has arisen, for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from auctioning the land and form dispossessing the plaintiff so long as the letter was willing to pay the Tah-bazari agreed to between them. The plaintiff filed the suit on the 1st of September, 1947. The defendant resisted the suit by saying that the land in qu


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top