SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 120

MODI
Hariram – Appellant
Versus
B. P. Sood – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal, for Petitioner; Thanchand, for Non-Petitioner; Kansingh, Dy. Government Advocate

Modi, J.—This is a reference by the Sessions Judge, Ganganagar and arises under the following circumstances: —

2. The case of the petitioner Hariram is that on the 20th of July 1954 Shri B. P. Sood, who was Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Raisingh Nagar at the time, abused one Ajit Singh during court hours. Ajit Singh lodged a report against Shri Sood at police Station, Raisingh-Nagar and cited the petitioner as a witness Shri Sood was annoyed at this and it is said that consequently, he managed to have a proceeding under sec 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code instituted by the police in his court against the petitioner. Shri Sood issued a non-bailable warrant against the petitioner, as a result of which he was arrested and produced in his court on the 26th of July 1954. The petitioner applied for bail, but Shri Sood, without deciding the application for bail, transferred the case to the court of the Extra First Class Magistrate Raisingh-Nagar, who eventually released the petitioner on bail. The petitioners case further is that on the 1st of August 1954, the Commissioner Bikaner Division and the Collector Ganga-Nagar happened to visit Raisinghnagar and were staying at the Rest House. The













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top