SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 269

WANCHOO, DAVE
Ramniranjan Kedia – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer "A" Ward, Udaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not available

Wanchoo, C. J.—This is an application by Ramniranjan Kedia under Art. 226 of the Constitution in an income-tax matter.

2. Though the application is a long one running into 44 paragraphs, the brief and salient facts on which it is based are these—

A notice was issued to the applicant under sec. 34(1) of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter called the Act) on the 27th of March, 1954, by the Income-tax Officer, Ajmer, in connection with the assessment year 1945-46, apparently on the ground that certain income had escaped assessment. The applicant appeared before the Income-tax Officer, and objected to the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to assess him under that section. The case came for disposal to the Additional Income-tax Officer, Ajmer stationed at Udaipur, and that Officer ordered levy of tax amounting to Rs. 2,92,666/5/- on the applicant by an order of March, 1955. The applicant has preferred an appeal against that order, and the appeal is pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. The applicant wanted stay of realization of tax from him. That stay has, however, not been secured by him. Later a penalty of Rs. 15,000/- was imposed on the applicant in July,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top