SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 203

WANCHOO, DAVE
Dalel Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tehsildar of Chhoti Sadri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.M. Trivedi, for Petitioner; Kansingh, Deputy Government Advocate

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application by Dalelsingh under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the holding of a by-election for the office of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat of Samarthali on the ground that the seat of the applicant, who had been elected Sarpanch in December, 1955, had become vacant.

2. The case of applicant is briefly this. He was elected Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat of Samarthali in December, 1955. The result of the election was notified in accordance with section 14 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 (Act No.XXI of 193) (hereinafter called the Act) on the 16th of June, 1956. The applicant says that thereafter he went to the Tehsildar to take the oath of office, as required by sec. 15 of the Act. He was then told that his seat had become vacant under sec. 17 (2) of the Act and a by -election had been ordered to be held in August: 1956. Consequently, the applicant made the present application challenging the holding of the by election on the ground that his seat had become vacant.

3. The main ground on which the applicant contends that his seat had not become vacant is that the Panchayat can only come into being after the notification under sec. 14 has been issued




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top