SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Raj) 146

BAPNA, BHANDARI, JAGAT NARAYAN
Lachhmi Narain – Appellant
Versus
Kalyan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B. Bhargava, for appellants; D.P. Gupta, for respondents

Bhandari, J.—This is a Civil Second Appeal in a suit for redemption. The main point involved is this appeal is whether the limited right of mortgagee can be acquired by adverse possession. There is an un-reported Division Bench case of this Court in Sarwan Lal vs. Gangadhar (Civil Second Appeal No. 220 of 1949), decided on the 12th October, 1955, is which in was held that such right can be acquired by adverse possession, but there is another Division Bench case of this Court in Hansia vs. Bakhtawar Mal (1), in which it has been held that such right cannot be acquired by adverse possession. When this appeal came up for hearing before one of us sitting as a single Judge, it was referred to a Division Bench, in view of the conflict of opinion between two Division Benches of this Court. Eventually, this special bench was constituted for deciding the appeal.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be briefly stated thus. On 7th October 1949, the plaintiffs Laxmi Narain and Sitaram filed a suit for redemption of a shop situated in the town of Reengus, against Mangi Lal and Rameshwar defendants. The case of the plaintiffs in the trial court was that Godha, Lachhmi Narain, Bala Bux and


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top