CHHANGANI
Nemichand – Appellant
Versus
Umedmal – Respondent
2. The respondent obtained a decree against the appellants for an amount of Rs. 1,339.8.0 with costs and future interest on 30th November, 1942. An application for execution was presented on 18.2.1948 admittedly within the period of limitation then in force in Marwar. The execution application had a chequered career and did not yield any result for any number of years. It was dismissed in default on 6.2.1956 in the absence of the decree-holder and this advocate and in the presence of the advocate for the judgment-debtor Bhikamchand. The decree-holder put an application on 9.2.1956 for restoration of application for execution. After notice to the respondent-judgment-debtor Bhikamchand the application was restored on 26.4.1956. Subsequently in the execution proceedings the property of the judgment-debtor was sold a few times but for one reason or the other the sale had to be set-aside. On 29-12-1958 a fresh sale-proclamation for the sale of the house of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.