DAVE, RANAWAT
Sunder Bai – Appellant
Versus
Tarachand – Respondent
2. The facts leading to this appeal may be briefly described as follows: —
3. Tarachand, Kundanmal, sons of Jetha, Kundanmal son of Megha and Chunilal son of Chaina, obtained a decree for an amount of Rs. 13,429/8/- against Jeevraj on the 19th of April, 1949 from the Court of the District Judge. The first execution petition was made by the decree-holders on the 3rd of May, 1949 which was dismissed on the 6th of February, 1954 and the second execution was presented by Tarachand in the Court of the Civil Judge, Jalore on the 10th of July, 1954. An objection petition was filed by the judgment-debtor on the 15th of January, 1956. It was pleaded by him that the execution petition was time-barred and that the decree was therefore not executable. The learned Civil Judge rejected the objection petition of the judgment-debtor and held that the second execution petition
(1) G.R. Naidu Vs. Yerramsetti Venkataswami Naidu (AIR 1940 Mad. 215)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.