SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 272

BHARGAVA
Rajja Babu Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Sayed Mohammad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P. Jain, for Appellants; P.C. Bhandari, for minor Mansoor

BHARGAVA, J.—This is an appeal by the decree holders against the decision of the learned District Judge, Bharatpur dated 15th December, 1953 affirming the order dated 20th July passed by the learned Civil Judge, Dholpur.

2. It appears that Dhaniram Sitalprasad and Ayodhya Prasad ancestors of the appellants obtained a decree on 25th February, 1924 for a sum of Rs. 3039/11/3 against one Talib Hussain in whose place the names of the present respondents have been substituted as his legal representatives.In execution of the decree some properties were auctioned and out of the sale proceeds the decree holders were paid Rs. 9041/4/3. The decree was declared satisfied and the execution proceedings were struck off. On 27th January, 1953 respondent learned Civil Judge overruled those objections and ordered that Rs. 1309/-/5 be refunded to the judgment debtor which has been paid in excess. On "appeal the learned District Judge, Bharatpur affirmed the said order and hence this second appeal.

3. It has been contended in this Court that:

(i) as the decree had been fully satisfied and the execution case struck off the executing court had become functus officio and had no jurisdiction to entertain th


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top