DAVE, RANAWAT, SARJOO PROSAD
Haridas – Appellant
Versus
Banshidhar – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to it are that Shri Banshidhar and Mannalal plaintiffs filed a suit in the court of the Civil Judge, Udaipur on 9th September, 1948, for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts against two defendants, namely, Haridas and Bhanwarlal The plaintiffs case was that the defendants were owners of a firm called "Bhatia-Saree-Stores" and that both of them, together with one Kishanlal Paliwal of Nathdwara, were also trading in tobacco under the) name and style of Rajasthan Tambkhu (Tobacco) Manufacturing Company. On 5th January, 1948, both the plaintiffs and the two defendants entered into a part-nership business and the name of this firm was kept as Rajasthan Tambakhu Company. The share of each one of the plaintiffs was five annas in a rupee while the share of the defendants was jointly five annals in a rupee. A branch of this firm was also started in the name of Banshidhar Mannalal. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that the defendants had committed breaches of the various terms of their agreement. The plaintiffs drew up in the plaint almost a catalo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.