BHANDARI
Mst. Sanjya – Appellant
Versus
Chauthmal – Respondent
2. The case as set up in the plaint is that on the 28th of July 1951, Mst. Sanjya, the defendant-appellant borrowed Rs. 901/- from the plaintiff and in security thereof mortgaged a shop situate in town of Manoharpur and delivered possession thereof. It was also agreed that the defendant-appellant shall pay 1% per mensem as interest, towards which Rs. 25/- per annum were to be adjusted as rent of the shop. This agreement was recorded in the Khata(Ex.P/l) which bears the thumb impression of the defendant-appellant. It is further alleged that the defendant-appellant delivered the possession of the shop but the plaintiff was dis-possessed therefrom on the 20th of May 1953 and refused to pay the money borrowed by her. It was further stated that as the Khata (Ex. P/l) was also executed in favour of Bhuramal (defendant No. 2 , he was also made a defendant in the case. The plaintiff prayed for a money decree for the amount of Rs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.