DAVE, CHHANGANI
Laduram – Appellant
Versus
Bhagchand – Respondent
2. The facts necessary and relevant for the disposal of the present appeal are simple and fall within a narrow compass. Elections for Gram Panchayat Jaisinghdesar (Magra) were held on 8.12.1960. Respondent No. 7 Harbhaj was elected Sarpanch. Respondents No. 1 to 5 and Shri Shivlal, Shri Goverdhan and Shri Anopsingh, who were opposite parties in the writ application, but no longer parties to the present appeal, in all eight persons, were elected as panchas. The total strength of the Gram Panchayat is 12 and three more Panchas, two women and one another, were required to be co-opted under sec. 9(1) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act (hereinafter called the Act). The Sarpanch
(2) N. T. Veluswami Thevar Vs. G. Raja Nainar (AIR 1959 SC 422)
(5) Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Ahmed Ishaque (AIR 1955 SC 233)
(1) Prabhu Dayal Vs. The Chief Panchayat Officer, Jaipur (1957 RLW 317=ILR VII Raj.
(3) Bhagirath Vs. The Collector
(4) Kalawati Vs. Munsif Bayana (1962 RLW 686)
(6) Shatrushal Singh Vs. Noor Mohammed (1959 RLW 431 = ILR 1959, 9 Raj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.