SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 165

MODI, SHINGHAL
Jain Brothers & Co. , Bundi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sagarmal Mehta, for appellant; Rajnarain, for respondent

Modi, J.—This is a plaintiffs second appeal in a suit for refund against the defendant State, which has been dismissed by the court below on the ground that it is barred under Article 62 of the Limitation Act. It has been placed before this bench, having been referred by one of us, sitting singly, as the question of limitation involved in this appeal was considered by the learned single Judge to be not free from serious difficulties.

2. The material facts leading up to this reference lie in a narrow compass. The plaintiff was a firm dealing in cloth at Bundi. The Customs Department of the defendant State recovered from the plaintiff on certain cloth imported by it during the period extending from the 19th August, 1949 to the 29th August, 1949, a sum of Rs. 894/9/9 as sales tax in addition to prescribed duty. The plaintiffs case was that the State had no authority to recover any money by way of sales-tax. Consequently the plaintiff after giving the necessary notice under sec. 80 C.P.C. instituted the present suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 894/9/9 as principal and Rs. 29/2/- as interest plus a sum of Rs. 1/11/- as notice charges, in all amounting to Rs. 925/6/9. This suit was i
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top