SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 26

CHHANGANI
Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Rastogi, for Petitioner; D.K. Soral, for Non-petitioner; Sampat Raj Singhi, for State

CHHANGANI, J.—This is a reference by the Sessions Judge, Bharatpur, recommending that the order of Munsiff-Magistrate, Bharatpur, dated the 31st Jan., 1963, for recording evidence before passing order as to the disposal of the stolen property consisting of a pair of oxen, be set aside and that the Munsiff Magistrate be directed to return the pair of oxen to the petitioner Mohan Singh.

2. The facts which have given rise to this reference may be briefly stated as follows—The opposite party Samla lodged first information report with the Police Station, Sewar, on 29th of May, 1962, accusing the petitioner Mohansingh of an offence of theft in respect of a pair of oxen. A case against the petitioner for an offence under sec. 380, Indian Penal Code, was registered by the police and investigation was commenced. After the completion of the investigation the police submitted a final report in the case on 1st November, 1962 saying that no offence was committed by the accused. On 3rd November, 1962 the petitioner Mohan Singh submitted an application before the Munsiff-Magistrate praying for the return of the pair of oxen to him on the ground that the pair of oxen was taken from his possession.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top