SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 228

Rajasthan High Court
Bhargava & Tyagi, JJ.
Prem Nath - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Writ Petition No.803 of 1964
Decided On : November 27, 1964

Advocates Appeared:
M.B.L. Bhargava, R.C. Bhargava and S.N. Bhargava, for Petitioners; Gulab Chand Kasliwal, Advocate General; Raj Narain Munshi, for Respondents Nos.1 to 4

Headnote:(a) Constitution of India, Arts. 233 and 309—Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1955—Rules though framed under Art.309 not violative of Art.233 as same framed in consultation with High Court.(b) Judicial Service—Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1955, R. 23 —Consultation is with High Court and not Selection Committee—High Court may modify list prepared by Committee. ](c) Judicial Service—Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, R.10— Fixation of ratio of recruitment not an embargo on Art.233 (2) of Constitution but a reasonable regulation of proportion.(d) Judicial Service—Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, R. 24— Discretion of Governor does not extend to pick and choose from the list—He is only to satisfy himself that person to be finally appointed possesses the requisite qualifications.(e) Judicial Service — Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1955— Rules do not preclude appointment as District Judge direct. ](f) Constitution of India, Art. 226— Civil and Additional Sessions Judge is an Additional Sessions Judge and is included in the term District Judge—Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1955.(g)—Judicial Service — Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, R. 10—Governor may take into account vacancies which have already occurred in fixing number.

       There is no reason why in fixing the number of vacancies for fresh recruitment the Governor cannot take into account the number of vacancies which have remained unfilled for any reason after the last recruitment. Such existing vacancies can be certainly taken into account in fixing the number of vacancies under rule 10.

       Though the period mentioned in this rule may be future period only though not exceeding three years yet in fixing the number of vacancies all unfilled vacancies after the last recruitment can be taken into account by the Governor. But the Governor is not bound to determine the period as provided in rule 10. He may decide to make appointments to the existing vacancies only and may not have any list prepared in advance for filling the vacancies occurring in future and thus recruitment can be validly held for filling up the existing vacancies only. (Paras 28 & 30)

BHARGAVA, J.—The petitioners who are all members of the Rajasthan Judicial Service have submitted this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the State of Rajasthan (Respondent No.l), the Honble Chief Justice Shri D. S. Dave Honble Justice I.N. Mondi, Judge High Court Rajasthan and Administrative Judge, High Court Rajasthan, Honble Justice D. M. Bhandari, Judge Rajasthan High Court (Respondents Nos. 2 to 4) and the Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Chairman praying for a writ of prohibition against the respondents Nos. 2 to 4 from holding interview or selecting or recommending the appointment of candidates for direct judicial appointments to the post of Civil and Additional Sessions Judges, or any other such judicial post to the Governor or declaring the result thereof and further for declaration that the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1955 (hereinafter called the Rules) are void and illegal. In the alternative it is prayed that the proceedings of the Recruitment Committee for selection of candidates be held to be illegal and be quashed because of non-compliance with the provisions of Rule 10 of the Rules and further the Selection Board be prohibited from filling vacancies in the Higher Judicial Service exceeding one fourth of the vacancies which have fallen vacant during the current year and the result should not be declared till selection from Judicial Service takes place as required by Rule 13 of the Rules and for any other appropriate writ or order.

2. On 9th May, 1955, His Highness the Raj Pramukh of the then (Part-B) State of Rajasthan in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, made rules regulating recruitment to posts in, and the condition of service of the persons appointed to the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service. These rules were first published in Rajasthan Gazette Extra-ordinary Part IV (G) dated 12th May, 1955 in Appointment Department Notification No. F. 21 (3) Apptts. (c)/55. Some of the relevant rules are as under:—

Part-I—General

R.1—Short title and commencement—(1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1935.

(2) They shall come into force at once and shall apply to the members of service consisting of District and Sessions Judges and Civil and Additional Sessions Judges.

R. 3—Status of the Service—The Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service is a State Service.

R. 4—Definitions—In these rules unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context —

(b) "Court" means the High Court of Judicature for the New State of Rajasthan.

(c) "Direct recruitment" means recruitment in the manner prescribed by cl. (ii) of sub-rule (1) of R. 7.

(e) "Member of Service" means a person appointed in a substantive capacity to a post in the cadre of the service under the provisions of these rules or of orders superseded by R.2;

(g) "Service" means the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service.

Part II—Cadre

R. 6—Strength of the Service—(1) The strength of the Service and of each class of posts therein shall be determined by the Governor from time to time in consultation with the Court.

(2) The permanent strength of the Service and of each class of posts therein shall, until orders varying the same have been passed under sub-rule (1), be as specified in Schdl. I.

(3) The Governor may, from time to time and in consultation with the Court, leave unfilled or hold in abeyance any post in the Service without thereby entitling any person to compensation, or create such additional temporary or permanent posts in the Service as may be found necessary.

Part III—Recruitment

R. 7—Sources of Recruitment—(1) Subject to the other provisions of these rules, recruitment to the Service shall be made to the posts of Civil and Additional Sessions Judges:—

(i) by promotion from among the members of the Rajasthan Judical Service; or

(ii) by direct recruitment in consultation with the court.

(2) Persons eligible for direct recruitment under cl. (ii) of






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top