Rajasthan High Court
Bhargava & Tyagi, JJ.
Prem Nath - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Writ Petition No.803 of 1964
Decided On : November 27, 1964
There is no reason why in fixing the number of vacancies for fresh recruitment the Governor cannot take into account the number of vacancies which have remained unfilled for any reason after the last recruitment. Such existing vacancies can be certainly taken into account in fixing the number of vacancies under rule 10.
Though the period mentioned in this rule may be future period only though not exceeding three years yet in fixing the number of vacancies all unfilled vacancies after the last recruitment can be taken into account by the Governor. But the Governor is not bound to determine the period as provided in rule 10. He may decide to make appointments to the existing vacancies only and may not have any list prepared in advance for filling the vacancies occurring in future and thus recruitment can be validly held for filling up the existing vacancies only. (Paras 28 & 30)
2. On 9th May, 1955, His Highness the Raj Pramukh of the then (Part-B) State of Rajasthan in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, made rules regulating recruitment to posts in, and the condition of service of the persons appointed to the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service. These rules were first published in Rajasthan Gazette Extra-ordinary Part IV (G) dated 12th May, 1955 in Appointment Department Notification No. F. 21 (3) Apptts. (c)/55. Some of the relevant rules are as under:—
Part-I—General
R.1—Short title and commencement—(1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1935.
(2) They shall come into force at once and shall apply to the members of service consisting of District and Sessions Judges and Civil and Additional Sessions Judges.
R. 3—Status of the Service—The Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service is a State Service.
R. 4—Definitions—In these rules unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context —
(b) "Court" means the High Court of Judicature for the New State of Rajasthan.
(c) "Direct recruitment" means recruitment in the manner prescribed by cl. (ii) of sub-rule (1) of R. 7.
(e) "Member of Service" means a person appointed in a substantive capacity to a post in the cadre of the service under the provisions of these rules or of orders superseded by R.2;
(g) "Service" means the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service.
Part II—Cadre
R. 6—Strength of the Service—(1) The strength of the Service and of each class of posts therein shall be determined by the Governor from time to time in consultation with the Court.
(2) The permanent strength of the Service and of each class of posts therein shall, until orders varying the same have been passed under sub-rule (1), be as specified in Schdl. I.
(3) The Governor may, from time to time and in consultation with the Court, leave unfilled or hold in abeyance any post in the Service without thereby entitling any person to compensation, or create such additional temporary or permanent posts in the Service as may be found necessary.
Part III—Recruitment
R. 7—Sources of Recruitment—(1) Subject to the other provisions of these rules, recruitment to the Service shall be made to the posts of Civil and Additional Sessions Judges:—
(i) by promotion from among the members of the Rajasthan Judical Service; or
(ii) by direct recruitment in consultation with the court.
(2) Persons eligible for direct recruitment under cl. (ii) of
(5-A) Keshavlal Lallubhai Patel vs. Lalbhai Mills Ltd. (AIR 1958 SC 512)
(8) Charanjit Lal Chowdhary vs. The Union of India (AIR 1951 SC 41)
(9) K. S. Shrinivasan vs. Union of India (AIR 1958 SC 419)
(10) L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala vs. Income-tax Officer (AIR 1961 SC 200)
(12) Parsohotam Lal Dhingra vs. Union of India (AIR 1958 SC 36)
(13) State of Bombay vs. F. A. Abrahaman (AIR 1962 SC 794)
(14) T. Devadasan vs. Union of India (AIR 1964 SC 179)
(1) N. Devashayam vs. State of Madras (AIR 1958 Mad. 53)
(2) Rajvi Amar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1956 Raj. 104)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.