CHHANGANI
Manna Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Narain Singh ... 366/511, 451 and 323 I.P.C
Magna ... 366/511, 451 325 and 323 I.P.C.
Mannalal ... 366/511,451 ... I.P.C.
Jamnalal ... 366/511, 45.1, 323 I.P.C.
He awarded the following sentences for these offences—
Narain Singh 366/511 I.P.C. 9 months R.I.
Jamnalal
Mannalal 451 I.P.C. 3 months R. I.
Magna
Magna 325 I.P.C. 6 months R. I. and Rs. 200/- fine in default 2 months R. I.
Narain Singh
Magna 323 I.P.C. Rs. 200/- fine, in default 2 months R. I.
Jamnalal
2. The prosecution case may be briefly stated as follows—
Mst. Bali, prosecution witness No. 5, was initially married to the accused Maganlal, Jat of Hurda. The prosecution suggests that Maganlal and the members of his family did not behave properly with Mst. Bali and turned her out of the house. It is further alleged that some time in June, 1963, she contracted a second nata-marriage with Moola Jat of Anandipura, The prosecution story further is that on 20th September, 1963, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.