SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 61

CHHANGANI
Manna Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kistoor Mal, for Appellants; Har Nath, for State

CHHANGANI, J.—The Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, tried the four appellants Narain, Jamnalal, Mannalal and Magna of offences under secs. 366, 325 read with sec. 34, 323 and 452, I.P.C., and by his order dated 3rd of December, 1965, convicted them as follows—

Narain Singh ... 366/511, 451 and 323 I.P.C

Magna ... 366/511, 451 325 and 323 I.P.C.

Mannalal ... 366/511,451 ... I.P.C.

Jamnalal ... 366/511, 45.1, 323 I.P.C.

He awarded the following sentences for these offences—

Narain Singh 366/511 I.P.C. 9 months R.I.

Jamnalal

Mannalal 451 I.P.C. 3 months R. I.

Magna

Magna 325 I.P.C. 6 months R. I. and Rs. 200/- fine in default 2 months R. I.

Narain Singh

Magna 323 I.P.C. Rs. 200/- fine, in default 2 months R. I.

Jamnalal

2. The prosecution case may be briefly stated as follows—

Mst. Bali, prosecution witness No. 5, was initially married to the accused Maganlal, Jat of Hurda. The prosecution suggests that Maganlal and the members of his family did not behave properly with Mst. Bali and turned her out of the house. It is further alleged that some time in June, 1963, she contracted a second nata-marriage with Moola Jat of Anandipura, The prosecution story further is that on 20th September, 1963, the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top