MODI, TYAGI
New National Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works, Bharatpur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. It is admitted that the petitioner has been carrying on the business of manufacture of medicinal and toilet preparations since 1956. On the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 (Act No. 16 of 1955 hereinafter called the Act) having come into force with effect from the 1st April, 1957, the petitioner obtained a licence in form L-1 in accordance with R. 83 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 (hereinafter called the Rules) made under the aforesaid Act. It is further admitted that the petitioner got his licence renewed from year to year until the 31st March, 1960. Before this licence expired, the petitioner had made an application on or about the 22nd February, 1960, to the Commissioner, Excise and Taxation of this State for renewal of his licence in form L-1. The petitioners grievance, however, is that the licence was not renewed and instead he received a letter from the Deputy Commissioner Excise and Taxation, Ajmer Division, Jaipur, to the effect that a sum
(7) A.V. Venkataswaran vs. R. S. Wadhwani (AIR 1961 SC 1506)
(8) M.B.B. Oushadhalaya vs. Union of India (AIR 1963 SC 622)
(9) H. C. & P. Works Ltd. vs. State of A.P. (AIR 1964 SC 1870)
(1) Madan Gopal Kabra vs. The Union of India (1951 RLW 35 = ILR 1951 I Raj. 96)
(3) Manohar Lal vs. Custodian, Rajasthan (1953 RLW 561 =ILR 1953
(4) M/s Karam Chand Thappar vs. Sales Tax Officer (1961 RLW 420=ILR 1961
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.