SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 110

MODI, TYAGI
Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M. Lodha, Advocate, for Petitioners; Rajnarain, Dy. G.A., for Respondents

MODI, J.—This is a writ application by Hari Singh and Mallu under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying that the order of the State Government conveyed by the secretary to the Government in the Revenue B Department, Jaipur, to the Collector, Ganganagar, under his letter No. F. 2(19) Rev/B/Gr. II/62 dated the 24th October, 1962, and certain proceedings taken prior thereto after the 26th April, 1960, and all subsequent proceedings taken in consequence thereof be quashed. By this order, a revision petition filed by the respondents Mahendra Singh against the judgment of the Revenue Appellate Authority, Bikaner, dated the 17th January, 1962, was partly allowed and it was decided that the prayer of the said respondents not to allow square No. 36 to the petitioners here (who were non-petitioners before the Government) be allowed and the respondents were left free to apply for the allotment of the aforesaid land to them if they so chose and a direction was further given that on their doing so, their application for such allotment be considered on the merits. Respondent Kaila Singh having died during the pendency of this writ application is represented by his widow and other heirs.

2. The dis





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top