SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 18

MODI
Jiwan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L. Tibrewal, for Applicants; Mool Chand Bhati, for State

MODI, J.—This application under Sec. 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by convict Lalia, Jagan Nath and Jiwan praying that the sentences imposed upon them in the three cases be ordered to run concurrently. In Sessions case No. 55 of 1964 decided on 27-11-65 the petitioners have been convicted under sec. 396 IPC by the learned Sessions Judge, Alwar and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years. In Cr. Case No. 18/897 of 1966 decided on 23-9-66, they have been convicted under secs.224, 332 and 379 IPC by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Alwar and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment under each count for one year, six month and six months respectively. All the three sentences have been made to run consecutively. In Criminal case No. 18/230 of 1965 decided on 3-2-68, the petitioners have been convicted under sec. 3/25 of the Indian Arms Act by the First Class Magistrate Rajgarh (Alwar) and each of them has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year.

2. The application is opposed on behalf of the State.

3. The question arises whether this court can exercise its inherent power to make the afo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top