LODHA
Ramnarain – Appellant
Versus
Nandlal – Respondent
2. The plaintiff owns two shops with a verandah near the Sabzi Mandi, Hope Circus, in the town of Alwar. Contiguous to the plaintiffs shops are the two shops with a verandah occupied by the appellants. The shops occupied by the defendants belong to Girraj Prasad, but have been taken on rent by the defendants, who carry on the business of preparing tea, sweets etc. in these shops. The plaintiffs case is that the defendants have unlawfully encroached upon the foot path described as a patri by placing a tea stall thereon and also tables, chairs, etc. on it, and have also obstructed the passage in the verandah as a result of which the plaintiffs right to access and frontage has been violated and a serious and substantial dama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.