SHINGHAL
Smt Dhanbai – Appellant
Versus
Pherozshah – Respondent
2. Pherozshah Fardoonji, the husband of the defendant Smt. Dhanbai admittedly died on December 23, 1956 leaving the defendant and their daughter Smt. Zarbai as bis heirs. It seems that he owned plots Nos. 450 and 451, including a petrol godown, in Pratabgarh. Plaintiff Pherozshah is also a resident of Pratabgarh On December 23, 1958, on the second anniversary of the death of the defendants husband, there was a contract between the plaintiff and "Perozshah Rustamji & Sons" for the sale of the suit land for Rs. 3,501/- in terms of document Ex. 1 executed by the defendant. The defendant received an advance payment of Rs. 101/-frorn the plaintiff and specifically stated in Ex. 1 that she would get the sale deed registered within two days. She further stated that she and her children will have no objection to the sale and that if any objection was raised, she herself would be personally responsible to her children. Then it was s
(31) Shankar Bandu vs. Shankar Babaji (AIR 1956 Bom 165)
(1) Gomathinayagam Pillai vs. Palaniswami Nadar (AIR 1967 SC 868)
(26 International Contractors Ltd. vs. Prasanta Kumar Sur (AIR 1962 SC 77)
(28) Nagubat Ammal vs. B. Shama Rao (AIR 1956 SC 593)
(2) Ardeshir H. Mama vs. Flora Sassoon (AIR 1928 P.C. 208)
(5) Tan Ah Boon vs. State of Johore (AIR 1936 P.C. 236)
(6) Abdullah Bey Chedid vs. Tenenbaum (AIR 1934 P.C. 91)
(18) Ma Hnit vs. Maung Po Pu (AIR 1919 P.C 24)
(20) Saral Kumar Chatterjee vs. Madhusudan Auddy (AIR 1964 Cal. 556)
(23) Ma Sa Bon Ma Da Twe (AIR 1924 P.C. 233)
(24) Costho Behari Sadhukhan vs. Omiyo Prosad Mullick (AIR 1960 Cal. 361)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.