SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 10

GATTANI
Prabhu Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Mahadev Nath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Bhandari, for petitioner; M.M. Tewari, for respondent No. 1

GATTANI, J.—These are certain Khasras of agricultural land measuring in all 4 Bighas and 13 Biswas in village Chharsa. Half of this land belongs to Amarnath respondent 4 and the other half belongs to Mahadevnath, Balunath and Narain Nath respondents Nos. 1 to 3 respectively. Respondents No 2 and 3 sold their share of land in favour of defendant petitioner Prabhu Dayal by means of registered sale-deed dated 24-9-69. This led to the filing of the suit by respondent No. 1 Mahadevnath upon the basis of right of preemption. Defendant Prabhudayal in his written statement inter alia pleaded that the sale being in respect of Khatedari right only, the suit was not maintainable as according to him provisions of Rajasthan Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are not applicable to agricultural lands. The lower court in this respect framed issue No. 6 as under :

"6 Is the present suit not maintainable?" It found favour with the plaintiff while deciding this issue on 25.5.70. Hence this revision.

2. The only point involved in this revision is whether what has been sold to the petitioner is pre-emptible.

3. The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is as follows :

The ownership i










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top