SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 208

JAGAT NARAYAN
Ram Bhagat Somani – Appellant
Versus
Kanhaiyalal Jainarain Tambi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Bhandari, for Petitioners; P.N. Datt, for Opposite-side

JAGAT NARAYAN, C.J. - This is a revision application by the defendant against an order of the Additional Munsif, Jaipur City, holding that he has jurisdiction to try the suit.

2. Defendant No. 1 is a firm carrying on business of commission agency at Poona and defendant No. 2 is a partner of the firm. The plaintiff is a firm carrying on business at Jaipur.

3. The plaintiff sent 151 bags of gram to the defendant-firm on 2-5-1970 from Jaipur by Rail for sale in its commission agency. It also sent 151 bags of gram-dal on 19-5-1970 from Khairtal (Alwar District) for the same purpose. Instructions were issued by the plaintiff from time to time as to the rate at which the gram and the gram-dal was to be sold. One allegation of the plaintiff is that the defendant-firm sold the gram and the gram-dal against its instructions and below the market rate and thereby caused loss to it. The defendant-firm received 800 kg. gram-dal short from the railway and compromised the claim for Rs. 652-80, when the claim should have been for Rs. 996-00 at Rs. 122-00 per quintal, without consulting the plaintiff. The plaintiff thereby suffered a further loss of Rs. 343-20. The defendant sent three accounts to th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top