SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Raj) 80

KAN SINGH
Umrao Mal – Appellant
Versus
Heera Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Agarwal & L.M. Lodha, for Appellant; D.P. Gupta & S.K. Keshote, for Respondent

KAN SINGH, J.—This is a defendants second appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment from certain premises known as a Nohra situated in the town of Alwar.

2. According to the plaintiff respondent the suit Nohra including the constructions thereon originally belonged to the State of Rajasthan. The premises were let out to the defendant-appellant for residence for a period of ten years, on a monthly rent of Rs. 14.50. On 15th April, 1964 the suit premises were purchased by the plaintiff. Thereafter he served the tenant with a notice on 6th June, 1966 and terminated the tenancy. The plaintiff filed the suit for ejectment, inter alia, on the ground of bona fide reasonable necessity. He averred that he wanted to construct a godown and also was desirous of putting up a mill for the manufacture of sugar, oil and dal. It was also averred that the defendant tenant had cut certain trees standing on the premises and thus damaged the property. The decree of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 43 50 was also prayed for.

3. The defendant contested the suit. It was admitted that the suit Nohra originally belonged to the State of Rajasthan and the same had been subsequently sold to the plaintiff. It wa






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top