KAN SINGH
Umrao Mal – Appellant
Versus
Heera Lal – Respondent
2. According to the plaintiff respondent the suit Nohra including the constructions thereon originally belonged to the State of Rajasthan. The premises were let out to the defendant-appellant for residence for a period of ten years, on a monthly rent of Rs. 14.50. On 15th April, 1964 the suit premises were purchased by the plaintiff. Thereafter he served the tenant with a notice on 6th June, 1966 and terminated the tenancy. The plaintiff filed the suit for ejectment, inter alia, on the ground of bona fide reasonable necessity. He averred that he wanted to construct a godown and also was desirous of putting up a mill for the manufacture of sugar, oil and dal. It was also averred that the defendant tenant had cut certain trees standing on the premises and thus damaged the property. The decree of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 43 50 was also prayed for.
3. The defendant contested the suit. It was admitted that the suit Nohra originally belonged to the State of Rajasthan and the same had been subsequently sold to the plaintiff. It wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.