KAN SINGH
Durgadan – Appellant
Versus
Devidan – Respondent
2. The plaintiff came forward with the case that on 29-6 67 the defendant agreed to sell him his agricultural land for Rs. 1,001/- and executed a sale deed on a stamp paper, but he refused to have it registered. He further averred that he was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract for bearing the expenses for registration. In the alternative the plaintiff prayed for refund of the money paid by him to the defendant.
3. The defendant contested the suit. He denied that he entored into any contract of sale with the plaintiff, as alleged. He further denied the execution of the sale document as also the receipt acknowledging the payment of Rs. 1,001/-to him. He further raised the plea that the suit was triable exclusively by a revenue court.
4. On the pleadings of the parties the learned Additional Munsif, Merta, by whom the suit came to be tried, framed the following issues:
"(1) Whether the defendant sold hi
(12) R. Reddy vs. Addl. Custodian Evacuee Property (AIR 1966 SC 1438)
(1) Bimal Kumari vs. Asoke Mitra (AIR 1955 Cal. 402)
(4) Chandmal vs. Dawar (1954 RLW 184)
(5) Asala vs. Narain (1963 RLW 323)
(6) Shankan Lal vs. Dhulilal (1963 RLW 313)
(9) Dayal Singh vs. Indar Singh (AIR 1926 P.C. 94)
(10) J.R.R. Skinner vs. R.H. Skinner (AIR 1929 P.C. 269)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.