SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JOSHI
Bhoorekhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Mridul, for Petitioner; M.D. Purohit, Additional Government Advocate; C.K. Garg, for Respondents

JOSHI, J.—The petitioner in this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeks an appropriate order, writ or direction for quashing the proceedings of the meeting dated 24th of April, 1975 and further declaring that no no-confidence motion against him was passed in the said meeting and that the respondents be restrained from interfering in the discharge of his duties as Sarpanch.

2. There is a Gram Panchayat known as Gram Panchayat of village Kayamser Dhandhoori in District Jhunjhunu having total strength of twelve members. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of the Panchayat. According to the petitioner the meeting of the said Gram Panchayat had been taking place at the village Kayamser Dhandhoori. A no-confidence motion against the petitioner was delivered to the concerned Additional District Development Officer, hereinafter to be referred to as the ADDO with a proposal expressing want of confidence in the petitioner. The said ADDO by his order dated 7th of April, 1975, appointed the Tehsildar Jhunjhunu to preside over the meeting to be held in respect of no-confidence motion. Later on the ADDO issued a notice fixing the date for consideration of the no-confidence



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top