SEN
Nehru Motor Transport Co-operative Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jodhpur – Respondent
2. Respondent No, 4 Ramchandra, who is a member of the petitioner society, raised a dispute under sec. 75 of the Act claiming that a sum of Rs. 16,143.50 p. was due to him from the Society. In his statement of claim, the respondent No. 4 asserted that various sums were deposited by him with the Society in his own name and in the name of his relations. In its written statement, there is an admission by the Society of these allegations, though it pleaded that the claim having been preferred beyond the period of limitation prescribed therefore, the claim should not be entertained. The s>le arbitrator by his award dated 5-1-1976 decreed the claim. The Rajasthan State Co-operative Tribunal Jaipur, by its order dated 29-7 1976 d
(2) Gandhinagar Motor Transport Society vs. State of Bom (AIR 1954 Bom 202)
(4) Prem Lata Agarwal vs. Lakshman Prasad Gupta (AIR 1970 SC 1525)
(5) Bachan Singh vs. Gauri Shankar Agarwal (AIR 1971 SC 1531)
(10) Nalinakhya Bysack vs. Shyam Sunder Haldar (AIR 1953 SC 148)
(13) Cf Raj. Krushna Bose vs. Vinod Kanungo (AIR 1954 SC 202)
(14) Ramaswamy Nadar vs. The State of Madras (AIR 1958 SC 56)
(15) Siraj-ul-Haq vs. Sunui Central Board of Waqf
(16) Champa Kumari Singhi Vs. The Member, Board of Revenue
(3) Ambaram Kaluram Kulmi vs. Guman Singh Ramji (AIR 1957 MP. 58)
(6) Raghunandanlal vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1952 Raj. 184)
(8) Barkatali vs. Custodian General of Evacuee Property of India (1955 RLW 95)
(9) Badridas Kanhaiyalal vs. Appellate Tribunal of State Transport Authority
(12) Ramkishandass Dhanuka vs. Satyacharan Law (AIR 1950 P.C. 81)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.