SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 26

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I., J.C. SHAH, K.S. HEGDE, A.N. GROVER, A.N. RAY AND I.D. DUA, JJ.
Champa Kumari Singhi and others, Appellants
Versus
The Member Board of Revenue, West Bengal and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 564 to 571 of 1968, D/- 2-2-1970.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Chagla, Senior Advocate (Mr. P. N. Tiwari, Advocate and M/s. J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, Advocate of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji & Co., with him), for Appellants (In all the Appeals); Mr. Jagadish Swarup, Solicitor-General of India, (M/s. R. Gopalkrishnan and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, with him), for Respondents (In all the Appeals).

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mrs. Seema Khajuria, AAG.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Moshin Bhat, Advocate for R 1 to 4.
Mr. Amrish Kapoor, Advocate for R-5.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 133 (1) - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Section 46 (2) - Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 - Section 7 , 51 and 53 - Company - Mining lease - Prospecting license - One held a prospecting license in earstwile Korea State - His son took a mining lease and started a colliery known Colliery - In a private limited Company called Jhagrakhand Collieries Ltd. was started with an authorised capital of Rs. 24 Lakhs (2400 shares of Rupees 1000 each.) divided equally 2400 shares between himself and his 3 sons - In colliery business and its assets were transferred by joint family to the Company - In father and his 3 sons separated and partitioned property - Died leaving a will - Letters of Administration with will annexed were granted time limit for such disclosure - Whether under main part of sub-section (7) proceedings for recovery of tax with penalty could be commenced after expiration of one year from last day of financial year in which demand was made – Held, Under that proviso where sum payable is allowed to be paid by instalments, the one year prescribed in sub-section (7) of Section 46 will be computed from date on which the last of such instalments was due - Expression "was due" does not appear to be grammatically correct - It should have been "is due" - This correction has been made in corresponding provision of tIndian Income-tax Act; but that error is immaterial for Court present purpose - In view of demand notices issued sum became due when assessees became defaulters and therefore recovery proceedings under Act should have been initiated before - Same having not been initiated before that date, the proceedings in question must be held to have been barred - In Court opinion for finding out date on which last instalment was due, Court cannot fall back on agreement between assessees and revenue - Chapter V of Act has nothing to do with agreement between assessees and revenue - Appeals dismissed.

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. :- This judgment shall dispose of Civil Appeals 564-571 of 1968. Of these, four are against the common judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, December 10, 1963, dismissing 4 appeals (139-142 of 1959) from the order of a learned Single Judge, April 23, 1959 in Writ Petitions 159-162 of 1958. The remaining four appeals are against the order, November 24, 1964, refusing to certify the case as fit for appeal to this Court under Article 133 (1) of the Constitution.

2. The facts are as follows: One Dalchand Singhi held a prospecting license in the earstwile Korea State (now in Madhya Pradesh). His son Bahadur Singh Singhi took a mining lease and started a colliery known as Jhagrakhand Colliery. In 1942 a private limited Company called the Jhagrakhand Collieries Ltd. was started with an authorised capital of Rs. 24 Lakhs (2400 shares of Rupees 1000 each.) Bahadur Singh divided equally the 2400 shares between himself and his 3 sons Rajendra Singh Singhi, Narendra Singh Singhi and Birendra Singh Singhi. In 1943 the colliery business and its assets were transferred by the joint family to the Company. In 1944 the father and his 3 sons separated and partitioned the property. Bahadur Singh Singhi died on July 7, 1944 leaving a will - Letters of Administration with the will annexed were granted in 1945. The register of Jhagrakhand Collieries Ltd., was rectified and showed thereafter 900 shares in the name of Narendra Singh Singhi and Rajendra Singh Singhi and 600 shares in the name of Rajendra Singh Singhi. Birendra Singh Singhi died on December 12, 1950 leaving a widow Smt. Champa Kumari and two minor sons Ashok Kumar Singhi, Chandra Kumar Singhi and also a minor daughter. These minors have now attained majority.

3. Under what is known as the Tyagi Scheme announced on May 19, 1951 a voluntary disclosure was made by the Jhagrakhand Collieries Ltd. and the share-holders. The time limit for such disclosure was August 31, 1951. Before this the Income-tax Officer had filed a complaint for certain offences and under a search warrant seized the books of account of the company from 1945 to 1950. This was on July 3, 1951. The shareholders and the company then disclosed on July 31, 1951 a concealed income of Rs. 42,52,501 during the years 1945 to 1948.

4. On November 28, 1951 the Commissioner of Income-tax offered to withdraw prosecutions if the Company and the share-holders agreed to pay taxes due on a total income of Rs. 90,00,000 to be distributed over the years 1945-1950 (both inclusive) together with a penalty of 20% and interest at 3% p. a. on unpaid tax. There were certain other conditions with which we need not concern ourselves. Certain representations followed and finally on December 26, 1951, it was agreed that the parties jointly and severally pay Rs. 67,48,841/11. It was also agreed that a sum of Rs. 55,99,832/6 would be accepted in full satisfaction upon the parties paying the amount in the following instalments:

(a) By December 31, 1951 ... Rs. 7,50,000

(b) By March 31, 1952 ... Rs. 5,00,000

(c) By March 31, 1953 ... Rs. 9,50,000

(d) By March 31, 1954 ... Rs. 9,50,000

(e) By March 31, 1955 ... Rs. 9,50,000

(f) By March 31, 1956 ... Rs. 9,50,000

(g) By March 31, 1957 the balance

On the failure of any of the instalments the whole sum of Rs. 67,48,341/11 together with interest would become due. A deed of Agreement, Guarantee and Equitable Mortgage showing the total income and total net tax liability of each share holder were shown. They were -

1947/48 to 1951-52 Total tax

Smt. Champa Kumari s husband ... Rs. 5,28,917-11

Rajendra Singh Singhi ... Rs. 9,30,498-03

Narendra Singh Singhi ... Rs. 9,93,816-15

Jhagrakhand Collieries Ltd. ... Rs.43,99,712-11

5. The Company paid the following sums by way of tax:

February 1, 1952 ... Rs. 3,50,000

April 1, 1952 ... Rs. 90,000

April 22, 1952 ... Rs. 1,22,000

Narendra Singh Singhi paid the following sums by way of tax:

February 1, 1952 ... Rs. 1,50











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top