P.D.KUDAL, MAHENDRA BHUSHAN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ukhram – Respondent
2. The police had submitted four challans before the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Alwar. As the challans were not accompanied with copies of the documents to be supplied to the accused, the Magistrate returned these challans to the police. The State feeling aggrieved against the order of the learned Magistrate preferred a revision petition before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Alwar. The learned Additional Sessions Judge observed that in pursuance of Police Rule 8. 17 read with Section 173 (7) and Section 207, Cr.P.C. the police should have filed copies of the relevant documents along with the challan.
3. When this petition came up for arguments for admission, the learned Public Prosecutor requested that as an important point of law is involved, this may be decided.
4. Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, provides that nothing contained in this Code shall, in the absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any special or local law for the time being in force, or any special juri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.