SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 198

P.D.KUDAL, MAHENDRA BHUSHAN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ukhram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not Available

P.D. KUDAL, J.—This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 1, Alwar dated 8/5/1979.

2. The police had submitted four challans before the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Alwar. As the challans were not accompanied with copies of the documents to be supplied to the accused, the Magistrate returned these challans to the police. The State feeling aggrieved against the order of the learned Magistrate preferred a revision petition before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Alwar. The learned Additional Sessions Judge observed that in pursuance of Police Rule 8. 17 read with Section 173 (7) and Section 207, Cr.P.C. the police should have filed copies of the relevant documents along with the challan.

3. When this petition came up for arguments for admission, the learned Public Prosecutor requested that as an important point of law is involved, this may be decided.

4. Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, provides that nothing contained in this Code shall, in the absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any special or local law for the time being in force, or any special juri



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top