DWARKA PRASAD
Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Dhanni – Respondent
2. The case of the plaintiffs was that they were owners of the shop in dispute. As the tenant Chandan Mal denied the title of the plaintiffs and claimed that he was a tenant of Shrimati Dhanni, they filed a suit for ejectment against him which was dismissed on the ground that the relationship of landlord and tenant was not proved between the parties. An appeal filed by them met the same fate and in second appeal this Court observed that in the absence of the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, the plaintiffs could seek a remedy by means of a separate suit to establish their title, if they thought that they had a title to the property in dispute. The present suit for possession was, therefore, filed by the plaintiffs on May 16, 1960 against Chandan Mal and Snot. Dhanni Bai.
3. The plaintiffs and Shrimati Dhanni Bai are descendants of a common ancestor, Girdharilal. The pedigree of the parties is as under : —
Girdharilal
Thakursi Bhawarsi Rajuji
Igyaram
Parwati
(widow) Hazarimal Punji
(Pannalal)
Shivnarain Jaikishan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.