SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 153

DWARKA PRASAD
Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Dhanni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Mathur, for Appellants; M.D. Kalla, for Respondents

DWARKA PRASAD, J.~-This second appeal arises out of a suit for possession of a shop, situated in Dhan Mandi in the town of Phalodi.

2. The case of the plaintiffs was that they were owners of the shop in dispute. As the tenant Chandan Mal denied the title of the plaintiffs and claimed that he was a tenant of Shrimati Dhanni, they filed a suit for ejectment against him which was dismissed on the ground that the relationship of landlord and tenant was not proved between the parties. An appeal filed by them met the same fate and in second appeal this Court observed that in the absence of the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, the plaintiffs could seek a remedy by means of a separate suit to establish their title, if they thought that they had a title to the property in dispute. The present suit for possession was, therefore, filed by the plaintiffs on May 16, 1960 against Chandan Mal and Snot. Dhanni Bai.

3. The plaintiffs and Shrimati Dhanni Bai are descendants of a common ancestor, Girdharilal. The pedigree of the parties is as under : —

Girdharilal


Thakursi Bhawarsi Rajuji


Igyaram

Parwati

(widow) Hazarimal Punji

(Pannalal)


Shivnarain Jaikishan









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top