SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 74

N.M.KASLIWAL
Girdhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Anand Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Rastogi, for Appellants; K.N. Tikku, for Respondents.

N.M. KASLIWAL, J. — This is a civil second appeal by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur, dated 2,8.1972 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Tonk dated 10 8.67 dismissing the suit for declaration and possession.

2. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that the plaintiffs-appellants (minors) filed a suit through their guardian Mathura Lal on 22.10.67 with the allegations that their father Nand Singh died four years ago at village Phuleta, Tehsil Aligarh. The plaintiffs were minor at that time and after the death of Nand Singh had acquired khatedari rights in the agricultural land left by Nand Singh and were heirs of other properties left by Nand Singh Initially the suit was filed against Anand Singh and Mst. Chhatra Kanwar widow of Nand Singh, but subsequently, Mst. Phool Kanwar daughter of Nand Singh was also added as defendant No. 3 by the order of the court dated 10.9.64. It was alleged that there was agricultural land in the khatedari of Nand Singh in village Phuleta. The defendant Anand Singh and Mst. Chhatra Kanwar in collusion got the agricultural land ment




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top