G.M.LODHA
Kishna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur – Respondent
2. Mr. Mehta has raised a preliminary objection that since the matter relates to Bikaner Division, the writ petitions cannot be entertained at Jaipur. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the revisional order was passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, and, therefore, this Court has got jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition.
3. Mr. Sharma has relied upon the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in Nasruddin vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal (1). Mr. Mehta has relied upon the judgment of this Court in Ram Rakh Vyas vs. The Union of India (2), in which validity of the notification dated 23-12-76 and the explanation added to it by the then Chief Justice Shri V.P. Tyagi was considered and after taking into consideration the de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.