MOHINI KAPUR, J.-The question which arises for determination in this revision is about the jurisdiction of the trial court after the matter has been remanded to it by the appellate court. In this case, a suit for partition of property was filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Bharatpur who decreed the suit on 27th September, 1976. In an appeal before the Additional District Judge, Deeg (Bharatpur), a certified copy of one document was admitted in evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. The appellate court allowed the appeal and set asid the judgment of the learned Civil Judge and issued a direction at the time of the remand that the plaintiff and defendant shall be given an opportunity to prove or dis-prove the document and thereafter the decision should be given. After the matter went back to the learned Civil Judge, the non-petitioners moved an application under Order 13 Rule 2 C.P.C. for the production of a document and this was admitted by the impugned order by the learned Munsiff and the same has been challenged in this revision.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the jurisdiction of the Court after remand is limited to the directions made by the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document