S.N.BHARGAVA
Kalu – Appellant
Versus
Chhitar – Respondent
2. Learned counsel for both the parties have made a request before me that this appeal may be disposed of at admission stage itself.
3. One of the points raised by learned counsel for the appellants is that defendants were not afforded ample opportunity to lead evidence and defendants witnesses were not examined as the list of witnesses was filed late.
4. The suit was filed on 6.10.1975; issues were framed on 14.3.1978 and when the plaintiffs were examining their witnesses, the defendants filed an application on 15.9.1979 alongwith list of witnesses which they wanted to examine. In the application, it was stated that the list could not be filed earlier as the defendant was ill. The paintiffs closed their evidence on 21.4.80 and thereafter, the case was fixed for defendants evidence. It was also ordered that if the defendant wanted to get the process issued, process fee should be filed within three days along with the witnesses expenses and the case was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.