SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 81

N.M.KASLIWAL
Manohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Sardar Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Shishodia, for Appellant; M.N. Mathur, for Respondents No. 1 to 5; B.R. Arora, for Respondents No. 6 to 12

N.M. KASLIWAL, J.—This appeal by the plaintiff Manohar Singh is directed against the judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Udaipur dated 11.7.1975. When the suit was filed Manohar Singh had claimed 1/3 share in the immovable property which consisted of a house belonging to the Joint Hindu Family. According to the plaintiff Manohar Singh the house was a Joint Hindu Family Property in which he, his brother Ganeshlal and their mother Badanbai had 1/3 share each. It may be mentioned at this stage that one Khubi-lal had purchased 1/2 share of Ganeshlal in an auction sale in a decree against Ganeshlal. A preliminary decree was passed by Senior Civil Judge, Udaipur on 2. 6. 1960 declaring 1/3 share of the plaintiff in the joint family property. An appeal was preferred against this judgment by the legal representatives of Khubi-lal and this Court by judgments dated 30.9.1970 in S.B. Civil Regular First Appeal No. 144/60 Basantilal vs. Manohar Singh and others, set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge and remanded the case for giving a decision afresh. After the remand of the case Smt. Badanbai expired and in these circumstances learned District Judge held that b

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top