SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 42

M.B.SHARMA, I.S.ISRANI
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Phool Chand Garg – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L. Pareek Addl. Government Advocate, for State; J.P. Goyal & S.C. Agrawal, for Respondents

M.B. SHARMA, J.—Ordinarily we would not have liked to go in this appeal into the question of legality of the order dated February 6, 1987, of the learned Single Judge made in Writ Petition No. 2386/86 as after the aforesaid order was made, investigation was taken over by the CBI and the investigation is said to be almost complete but because a larger issue about the powers of this court to interfere at the stage of investigation or transfer of the case from the local police to CBI, is involved we will proceed to examine the issue.

2. We may at the outset state that we would not like to go into the ques-tion whether the death of Prakash Chand Garg was as a result of the accident as alleged by the prosecution or was a murder as alleged by Phool Chand Garg, his brother. This is a matter which depends on the collection of evidence and is to be adjudged by the court. All that we may state in this Special appeal is that one Damodar Prasad who is said to be the nephew of Phool Chand Garg, the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition in this Court, now presented FIR No. 294/86 lodged on August, 1, 1986, at 10 p.m. in Police Station Sawai Madhopur that Prakash Chand Garg was coming on a mot













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top