FAROOQ HASAN
Ram Avtar Khandelwal – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jodhpur Through its Registrar – Respondent
(2) Undisputed facts are thus. The petitioner was appointed as Munsif & Judicial Magistrate and was confirmed. Vide order (Ann. 3) dated August 3, 1989, six Judicial Officers holding posts of Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, namely, Shiv Dayal Gupta, M.A. Siddique, Om Prakash Sharma II, Naresh Chandra Rawat, Narain Das Bilochi, Chandra Prakash Singh, out of whom last four persons are admittedly juniors to the petitioner, were given promotion to the post of Civil Judge-cum-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, and against that, the petitioner made his representation vide Annexure 4, dated August 8, 1989. Vide Annexure 5, dated September 13, 1989, the petitioner was communicated the adverse remarks made in his Annual Confidential Report for the year 1983 as under :
"Integrity highly doubtful. He is not fai
(6) Gurdial Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1979 SC 1622)
(1) Baidhyanath Mahapatra vs. State of Orissa (1989 (4) SCC p. 664)
(2) State of Harayana vs. P.C. Wadhawa (1987 (2) SCC 602)
(4) H.L. Trehan vs. Union of India (1989 (1) SCC 764)
(5) K.I. Shephard vs. Union of India (1987 (4) SCC 431)
(3) M.C. Taylor vs. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (1991 (1) RLR 143)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.