N.L.TIBREWAL, K.C.AGRAWAL, M.B.SHARMA
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India (27) – Respondent
(2) For dealing with the arguments raised before us, it will be useful to refer the legislative history as well as the various sections of the Act.
(3) Before the present Act was passed, the Parliament had passed an Act known as The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 to prescribe punishment for the (preaching and practice of "Untouchability") for the enforcement of any disability arising therefrom and for matters connected therewith.
(4) The statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Bill of the aforesaid Act was that the Bill before the Act was passed had been prepared in pursuance of Article 17 of the Constitution, by which untouchability was abolished and its practice in any form was forbidden.
(5) The Hindus who form the majority in our country are divided into four Varnas-namely, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and lastly Shudras.
(6) The untouchability is a product of the Hindu Caste System. In Hadibandhu Behera vs. Ban
(3) Venkataswami vs. Narasram Narainda (AIR 1966 SC 361)
(5) Shashikant Laxman Kale vs. Union of India (AIR 1990 SC 2114)
(9) Narcotics Control Bureau vs. Kishan Lal & Others (1991 (1) SCC 705)
(1) Hadibandhu Behera vs. Banamali Sahu (AIR 1961 Ori. 33 at 34)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.