SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 125

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble G.S. SlNGHVl, J.
Major Radha Krishna - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2871 of 1989
Decided On : March 26, 1993

Advocates Appeared:
S.D. Sharma and Rajendra Prasad, for Petitioner Praveen Balwada, for the respondents.

Headnote:(a) Army Act, 1950, Sec. 19 & 122 and Army Rules, 1954, Rule 14 & 180 — For issue of notice power u/r 14 can be invoked the conditions are to be fulfilled — Consideration of reports of the officers of misconduct by the central Govt. or the Chief of Army Staff — Satisfaction recorded by the Central Govt. or the Chief of Army Staff that trial of the officer by a court martial is inexpedient or impracticable — Lastly formation of opinion that retention of the officer in the service is undesirable and the formation of opinion has to be based on objective consideration — Opinion of Chief of Army Staff based on wholly irrelevant and extraneous considerations — Notice quashed. (Para 20)(b) Army Act, 950, Sec. 19 & 122 and Army Rules, 1954, Rule 14 & 180 and Principles of Natural Justice—Dismissal from service —Officer not confronted with the Adverse Enquiry Report and the same is relied on in taking decision of dismissal—Dismissal order violates Rule 14 and Principles of Natural Justice—With the quashing of enquiry and the order of dismissal the right to be promoted stands revived. (Para 31)

       

Honble SINGHVI, J.—Originally this writ petition was filed by the petitioner for his promotion as Acting Lt. Col. and against his supersession by the promotion of respondent No. 12. The petitioner had also made a prayer for restraining the respondents not to initiate any administrative action against him in respect of a matter which was considered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2273/86, Major Radha Krishna vs. Union of India and others, decided on 15.12.1988. However, during the pendency of the writ petition an order dated, 28.2.1992 (Annex. 13) came to be passed by the Government of India dismissing the petitioner from service. Therefore, the petitioner made an application on 16.3.92 for leave to amend the writ petition. This application was accepted by the Court on 9.4.92 and the petitioner was allowed to assail the legality of the order dated, 28.2.92 and also to make a prayer for quashing of the said order dated, 28.2.92. Now the petitioners prayer relate not only to quashing of the order of punishment passed against him but also for his promotion with retrospective effect and for grant of consequential benefits.

(2). Facts which are necessary for deciding the controversy raised in the writ petition are that the petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Army (Farms) on 15.6.66. He was promoted to the rank of Major on 15.6.79. S/Shri V.P.Singh (now Lt. Col.) and Ranvir Singh (now Lt. Col.) were promoted to the rank of Major alongwith, the petitioner. The petitioner claims that his Annual Confidential Reports for the years 1982-83, 1983-84 and 1984-85 have been above average. In December 1985 a Selection Board was constituted for selection of officers for promotion to the rank of Lt. Col. in Military Farms Branch. This Selection Board examined Annual Confidential Reports of eligible officers including two years Military Farms Command records. It is the case of the petitioner that the Selection Board recommended three officers including the petitioner and placed them in acceptable grade. By letter dated, 27.6.86 (Annex.l) the petitioner was informed by the Army head quarters that he has been placed in acceptable grade for promotion to the rank or A/Lt. Col. and he will be promoted as and when suitable vacancy is available subject to his record of service remaining satisfactory and his remaining in acceptable medical classification. When three vacancies became available in April 1987 in the cadre of Lt. Col. (Military Farm Branch), Major V.P. Singh and Major Ranbir Singh were promoted to the rank of Acting Lt. Col. However, in the case of the petitioner an order of promotion was not issued due to a ban imposed by the Director General of Discipline and Vigilance, Army Headquarters.

(3). Petitioners case is that his promotion as Actg. Lt. Col. was kept under cloud on account of repeated Courts enquiries and a person junior to him namely, Major A.S.K. Swarnpandian was unlawfully promoted w.e.f. 17.3.89.

(4). In relation to the order of punishment the petitioner has stated that on 24.5.82 he took over charge of Military Farm, Jaipur alongwith Military Farm Depots, Kota, Ajmer, Jodhpur and Nasirabad from Shri S.P. Singh, Manager. During the course of handing over/taking over the petitioner had made specific remarks regarding loose hay of local purchase and baled hay having not been kept in thatched form. He made a report to this effect to the then Dy. Director, Military Farms, Southern Command, Mirkee, Pune. In his report, the petitioner had pointed out shortage in the hay and therefore, he made a request for 100% weighing of stack No. 1. He had specifically stated that he suspected shortage of stack. By secret letter No, SC-1 dated, 20.09.1983 the petitioner had made a request for taking of photographs of Military Farms Stack Yard. However, no action was taken on the same. On 6.2.84 fire broke out in Military Farm, Jaipur in which one stack of loose hay containing 1,10,290 Kg. of hay costing Rs. 73315.25/- was destroyed. Petitioner






























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top