Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble G.S. SlNGHVl, J.
Major Radha Krishna - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2871 of 1989
Decided On : March 26, 1993
(2). Facts which are necessary for deciding the controversy raised in the writ petition are that the petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Army (Farms) on 15.6.66. He was promoted to the rank of Major on 15.6.79. S/Shri V.P.Singh (now Lt. Col.) and Ranvir Singh (now Lt. Col.) were promoted to the rank of Major alongwith, the petitioner. The petitioner claims that his Annual Confidential Reports for the years 1982-83, 1983-84 and 1984-85 have been above average. In December 1985 a Selection Board was constituted for selection of officers for promotion to the rank of Lt. Col. in Military Farms Branch. This Selection Board examined Annual Confidential Reports of eligible officers including two years Military Farms Command records. It is the case of the petitioner that the Selection Board recommended three officers including the petitioner and placed them in acceptable grade. By letter dated, 27.6.86 (Annex.l) the petitioner was informed by the Army head quarters that he has been placed in acceptable grade for promotion to the rank or A/Lt. Col. and he will be promoted as and when suitable vacancy is available subject to his record of service remaining satisfactory and his remaining in acceptable medical classification. When three vacancies became available in April 1987 in the cadre of Lt. Col. (Military Farm Branch), Major V.P. Singh and Major Ranbir Singh were promoted to the rank of Acting Lt. Col. However, in the case of the petitioner an order of promotion was not issued due to a ban imposed by the Director General of Discipline and Vigilance, Army Headquarters.
(3). Petitioners case is that his promotion as Actg. Lt. Col. was kept under cloud on account of repeated Courts enquiries and a person junior to him namely, Major A.S.K. Swarnpandian was unlawfully promoted w.e.f. 17.3.89.
(4). In relation to the order of punishment the petitioner has stated that on 24.5.82 he took over charge of Military Farm, Jaipur alongwith Military Farm Depots, Kota, Ajmer, Jodhpur and Nasirabad from Shri S.P. Singh, Manager. During the course of handing over/taking over the petitioner had made specific remarks regarding loose hay of local purchase and baled hay having not been kept in thatched form. He made a report to this effect to the then Dy. Director, Military Farms, Southern Command, Mirkee, Pune. In his report, the petitioner had pointed out shortage in the hay and therefore, he made a request for 100% weighing of stack No. 1. He had specifically stated that he suspected shortage of stack. By secret letter No, SC-1 dated, 20.09.1983 the petitioner had made a request for taking of photographs of Military Farms Stack Yard. However, no action was taken on the same. On 6.2.84 fire broke out in Military Farm, Jaipur in which one stack of loose hay containing 1,10,290 Kg. of hay costing Rs. 73315.25/- was destroyed. Petitioner
(2) Harbhajan Singh vs. Ministry of Defence (1982 (2) SLR 782)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.