RAJENDRA SAXENA
Hemraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Briefly the necessary facts for the disposal of this petition are that on 26.7.83 the Food Inspector, Sri Ganganagar took a sample of wheat flour (Aata) from the shop of the petitioner and sample thereof was sent for chemical analysis to the Public Analyst, Public Health Laboratory, Sri Ganganagar, who opined that the said sample was adulterated as the same was not confirmed to the prescribed standard of purity. Ultimately on 11.11.83 the Food Inspector filed a criminal complaint under Section 7/16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 against the petitioner in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar. The petitioner appeared in the court for the first time on 16.4.1984. On 20.3.1985, the substance of the accusation under section 251 Cr.P.C. was stated to him, to w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.