SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 32

R.R.YADAV
Devki Nandan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahesh Vyas & Manish Sisodia, for Petitioners P.P. Choudhary, for the Union of India

Honble YADAV, J. –This is an application for bail filed by the accused petitioners in the case under Sections 8/19 and 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as `N.D.P.S. Act).

(2). The prosecution case stated in brief as disclosed in the FIR No. 1/95 lodged on 21.10.95 at 8.00 P.M. is that in the crop year 1994-94 the accused petitioners alongwith other cultivators have been granted licences for opium poppy cultivation as per policy decision taken by the Central Government.

(3). All the licenced cultivators were under obligations to deliver all opium produce of their plots cultivated with opium poppy as stipulated in their licences It is further alleged that the accused persons named in the said FIR hatched a conspiracy by committing forgery in the Preliminary Vehement Register (hereinafter referred as `P.W.R) commonly known as `Kachcha Taul Register and in the process they changed the pages of P.W.R. so that their villages may be declared damaged opium crop area and they can show less opium produced by them.

(4). It is also alleged that the accused persons named in the FIR have collected Rs. 2,000/- from each cultivator of villages Jaw



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top