SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 282

N.K.JAIN
Dinesh Chandra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajesh Joshi, for Petitioner Vijay Bishnoi, for Respondents

Honble JAIN, J. – It is alleged that the petitioner applied for the post of Teacher in pursuance of the advertisement issued in the year 1988 and he was selected vide order dt. 8.11.1988. The petitioner was having B.Ed. from the Methili University, Darbanga through Delhi Vishwa Vidya Peeth, Delhi, to his credit vide order dt. 11.3.93 (Annx.10), the services of the petitioner were terminated on the ground that the B.Ed. degree obtained by him is forged and that as per the orders dt. 30.11.92 and 23.1.93 the said University has been declared illegal. Hence, this writ petition.

(2). The respondents have filed reply stating that the petitioner was selected as Teacher Gr. III but he was terminated from service as the B.Ed. degree obtained by him from Mathili University, Darbhanga (Bihar) has been found to be illegal. It has been stated that as per direction of the State Government on verification of the degree obtained by the petitioner from Methili Vishwa- vidhyapeeth Darbhanga (Bihar) and the Methili Vishva-Vidhyapeeth, Darbhanga it has been informed vide letter dt. 30.11.92 (Anx. R/1) that the B.Ed. examination conducted by the Delhi Vidhyapeeth have been declared illegal and cancelle














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top