Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.6.94 in Appeal No. 6/89 by which the Board of Revenue has reversed the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority dated 15.12.88 in Appeal No. 251/88.

(2). The facts of the case as revealed by the record of the case are that in the Revenue Record particularly, relating to settlement of Samwat 2009 the land in dispute measuring 256 bighas and 15 biswas was shown in the name of Temple Shri Thakurji, the present petitioner, and one Shri Mangha Ram son of Nand Ram, predecessor in interest of respondents No.4 to 7, was shown as the Pujari and care taker of petitioner temple and was looking after the land in dispute, as is evident from Ex.1, issued on 21st June 1945. It is also revealed from the said Ex.1 that Shri Mangha Ram had made a statement before the Competent Authority on 24th Feb. 1945, that the said Temple of Shri Thakurji was very old and the land in dispute was the property of the petitioner temple and being Pujari of the temple he was looking after the said land. It appears that Mangha Ram, pujari had manipulated Revenue Record and was shown subsequently as khatedar of the land i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document