N.L.TIBREWAL, B.S.CHAUHAN
National Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Prakash Rohila – Respondent
(2). Respondent is an employee of the appellant Company which floated a ra- tionalisation scheme in 1985, amending the earlier rationalisation scheme of 1974, bracketing/bunching the employees in two or more consecutive stages together and fixing a revised pay scale for them. Thus, the scheme provided for restructuring the pay scales. For the purpose of implementation of the said rationalisation scheme, all the employees of the appellant Company were asked, either to opt for re-fixation from 1.4.1983 or from 15.10.1985. Conseque
5. Maharashtra S.R.T.C. vs. Balwant Regular Motor Service
6. Ajit Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (AIR 1967 SC 856)
7. Messers Pannalal Birjraj & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 1957 SC 397)
8. State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Kishan Niwas (AIR 1997 SC 2349)
9. R.N. Gosain vs. Yashpal Dhir (AIR 1993 SC 352)
12. Maharashtra S.B.O.S. & H.S. Education vs. P.B. Kurmarseth (AIR 1984 SC 1543)
16. Delhi Science Forum & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1356)
2. Union of India & Ors. vs. P. Jagdish & Ors. (1997 (3) SCC 176)
3. State of Punjab vs. Dharam Paul (1996 (7) SCC 295)
4. Association Bank Officers Association vs. State Bank of India & Ors. (JT 1997 (8) SCC 422)
13. G.B. Mahajan & Ors. vs. Jalgaon Municipal Council & Ors. (1991 (3) SCC 91)
14. State of Bihar vs. Mohd. Kalimuddin (1996 (2) SCC 7)
15. U.P. Katha Factories Association vs. State of U.P. & Ors. (1996 (2) SCC 97)
18. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. (1996 (9) SCC 709)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.