SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 752

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH
Ganpat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.S. Champawat, for Petitioner D.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor

Honble SINGH, J. – Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

(2). The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the object of getting expunged certain remarks made by Honble Mr. Justice Milap Chandra Jain in the order dated 29th January, 93 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Peti- tion No. 17/91 Parbat Singh vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. In para No. 6 of the order dated 29th January, 1993 this Court made the following observations :–

``14 dates were fixed in the case for recording the statement of the investigating officer Karan Raj as the learned Public Prosecutor did not take necessary steps to ascertain his latest address as was expec- ted from a Public Prosecutor. Such a lapse on his part cannot be allowed to help the accused persons in a murder case but deserves to be reported to the Government in the Law Department for necessary action against him.

(3). The relevant facts which are necessary for the disposal of the case may be briefly summarised as below :–

(4). A Sessions case No. 63/91 State vs. Jalam Singh and Ors. under Sections 302, 307, 325 and 323 IPC was pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore. In tha



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top