Honble SINGH, J.–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the non-petitioners.

(2). In these six petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, common question of law has arisen for decision. All the 6 petitions are against the orders passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balotra on 7th Feb- ruary, 1986 in criminal cases pending before him. Six revision petitions were filed by the petitioner under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Court of District & Sessions Judge, Balotra against the orders dated 7.2.86 passed by the Addl. Chief Judl. Magistrate, Balotra and all the six criminal revision petitions were disposed of by the learned District & Sessions Judge by a common order. It is, there- fore, proper to dispose of these petitions by a common order.

(3). Shorn of details, the relevant facts for the purpose of disposing of these petitions are as given below :

(4). Criminal Original Cases No. 270/83, 272/83, 269/83, 268/83, 271/83, and 267/83 were instituted on the basis of complaints filed on behalf of the Rajasthan State Board for Prevention and Control of Pollution, Jaipur alleging the commission of offences pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document