SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 711

B.S.CHAUHAN
Prabhakari Adhikari, Devasthan Department, Jodhpur – Appellant
Versus
Jamsher Ali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vineet Kothari, for Petitioners L.R. Mehta, for Respondents

Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 30.11.93 passed by the learned District Judge/Appellate Authority under the Rajasthan Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred as ``the Act), by which it has set-aside the order dated 9.9.1983 passed by the Estate Officer against the respondents in Case No. 138/1981.

(2). The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that respondent No. 1 Jamsher Ali was given shops Nos. 39,40 and 41, and Maliyas Nos. 62 and 63, total five units, on a monthly rent of Rs. 53/- by the State Devasthan Department Vide rent note dated 1.6.1968 (Annexure 5). The said rent note provided for a clause putting embargo no sub-letting the said premises or any part thereof by the said lessee and in violation of the said term, respondent No. 1 inducted respondents No.2 and 3 in a part of the said premise; and in violation of the terms of the rent note, the respondent No.1 had,also, made material alterations in the rented premises. The petitioner served a notice dated 3.7.80 (Annexure 11) determining the te- nancy in favour of the respondent No. 1 for violati


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top