SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 45

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH
Mohammed Yousuf – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abdul Sattar, for Petitioner

Honble SINGH, J.–Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2). This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.09.1998 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Jodhpur City, Jodhpur City, Jodhpur in Civil Suit No. 73/96 Bharat Singh vs. Mohd. Yousuf. By the impugned order, the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 18 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(3). It appears that the plaintiff moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint. The application filed by the plaintiff was allowed by the order dated 17.03.1998 subject to payment of costs to the tune of Rs.150/- payable to the defendant. By the same order, it was directed that the amended plaint should be filed within a period of 14 days. The court, however, adjourned the case to 02.04.1998. The amended plaint was not filed within the period of 14 days allowed by the order dated 17.03.1998. The amended plaint was filed on 02.04.1998 which was the date fixed for hearing by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) in his order. On 02.04.1998 when the amended plaint was filed, no objection was ra








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top