B.J.SHETHNA
Satyam Properties – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent
(2). Before dealing with the submissions raised by the learned counsel Shri Singhvi for the petitioners in all these cases, I must state few important facts, which are as under:-
``(i) The petitioner-Satyam Properties is the sole petitioner in all these petitions.
(ii) The petitioner in all these petitions has challenged the impugned notice dated 18.11.1997 (Annex.6) issued by the respondent no.2, Collector (Stamps), Bhilwara calling upon the petitioner to deposit the amount assessed, failing which the proceedings for recovering the amount as arrears of land revenue be initiated against it. And, also the order dated 26/27.11.97 (Annex.7) issued by the Tehsildar, Bhilwara calling upon the petitioner to deposit the amount in addition to other amount mentioned in the notice.
(iii) The plots in question is a part of big industrial property known as ``Duduwala Property in an industrial town of Bhilwa
1. Jagdish Lal vs. State of Haryana (AIR 1997 SC 2366)
5. Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 1974 SC 259)
6. Shri Vallabh Glass Works Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 1984 SC 971)
2. Salonah Tea Co. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Superintendent of Taxes
7. State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Mohabir Singh & Ors. (1996 (1) SCC 609)
8. Smt. Prakashwati vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & Ors. (1996(4) SCC 657)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.