2000 Supreme(Raj) 174
ARUN MADAN
Harjeet – Appellant
Versus
Megha – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Sharma, for Petitioner Devendra Singh Raghav, for Respondents
Honble ARUN MADAN, J.–This revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC arises out of the order dated 15.5.1997 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Anta Distt. Baran in Suit No. 30/96 by which the said trial Court directed that the agreement on the basis of which the suit for specific performance had been filed could not be admitted in evidence. The facts which are relevant for deciding the controversy between the parties briefly stated are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a civil suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 9.6.1975 of agricultural land measuring 7/1 Bighas situated in Khasra No. 1163 which he had purchased from the defendant-respondents for sale consideration of Rs. 2000/-and in lieu of its payment, the respondents handed over its possession to the plaintiff. The recitals of the said agreement had provided that plaintiff could get the sale deed executed and registered for which defendant would extend all co-operation and the registration charges were to be borne by the plaintiff. In token of confirmation of the aforesaid agreement the possession of the land in question had also been handed over to the plaintiff. From the recitals of th
Click Here to Read the rest of this document