SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 174

ARUN MADAN
Harjeet – Appellant
Versus
Megha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Sharma, for Petitioner Devendra Singh Raghav, for Respondents

Honble ARUN MADAN, J.–This revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC arises out of the order dated 15.5.1997 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Anta Distt. Baran in Suit No. 30/96 by which the said trial Court directed that the agreement on the basis of which the suit for specific performance had been filed could not be admitted in evidence. The facts which are relevant for deciding the controversy between the parties briefly stated are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a civil suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 9.6.1975 of agricultural land measuring 7/1 Bighas situated in Khasra No. 1163 which he had purchased from the defendant-respondents for sale consideration of Rs. 2000/-and in lieu of its payment, the respondents handed over its possession to the plaintiff. The recitals of the said agreement had provided that plaintiff could get the sale deed executed and registered for which defendant would extend all co-operation and the registration charges were to be borne by the plaintiff. In token of confirmation of the aforesaid agreement the possession of the land in question had also been handed over to the plaintiff. From the recitals of th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top